Skip to main content

Price and risk are coupled

On DerivaDEX, price handling and risk controls are part of one solvency model:
  • mark price drives margin and liquidation checks
  • price-deviation and banding controls bound execution extremes
  • pre-trade and in-match solvency checks enforce account safety

Read this page when

If your question is…Use this page because…
why mark price, liquidation, and solvency belong in one system storyit explains the mechanism coupling rather than listing isolated formulas
how liquidation, ADL, and the insurance fund fit together conceptuallyit connects those controls as one risk-resolution model
why public reference pages talk about price inputs, margin, and safeguards separatelyit provides the rationale that ties those factual references together

Mechanism chain

The public mechanism is easiest to read as one chain:
  1. DerivaDEX derives the mark-price view from its documented price-input sources and smoothing or banding rules.
  2. Margin and solvency checks use that risk price rather than the last traded price.
  3. Pre-trade and in-match safety controls reject or bound requests that would create unsafe state.
  4. If a live position falls below maintenance thresholds, liquidation is triggered through the normal risk-resolution path.
  5. If normal liquidation cannot restore safety cleanly enough, ADL becomes the fallback resolution path.

Liquidation and ADL in the model

When margin deteriorates below maintenance thresholds, liquidation is queued and executed through normal market path where possible. If liquidity constraints or solvency constraints prevent safe completion, ADL provides fallback risk resolution. Insurance-fund debits and credits close the loop between liquidation outcomes and system solvency. Two implementation details matter for understanding why the fallback is safety-critical:
  • liquidation work moves ahead of ordinary matching once an account enters the liquidation queue
  • ADL closes the unresolved path at the liquidated account’s bankruptcy price rather than at an arbitrary market-derived fallback

Normal liquidation versus ADL

PathPublic reading
Normal liquidationFirst-line risk resolution when unsafe exposure can still be reduced or closed through the ordinary liquidation path
ADLFallback resolution path when liquidity or solvency conditions prevent safe completion of the normal liquidation flow
Insurance fundSolvency backstop that absorbs or redistributes losses as part of the broader liquidation and ADL safety model

Sources

Move to operational references

Boundary rule

Use this page for mechanism rationale. When you need exact thresholds, input values, or event terminology, continue into the linked reference pages rather than treating this explanation as the normative numeric contract.
Last modified on April 12, 2026